Apple describes the Justice Department's allegations "absurd" and "fundamentally flawed," accusing them of "ignoring inconvenient facts" and siding with monopoly rather than competition.
The Government starts from the false premise that an eBooks "market" was characterized by "robust price competition" prior to Apple's entry. This ignores a simple and incontrovertible fact: before 2010, there was no real competition, there was only Amazon. At the time Apple entered the market, Amazon sold nearly nine out of every ten eBooks, and its power over price and product selection was nearly absolute. Apple's entry spurred tremendous growth in eBook titles, range and variety of offerings, sales, and improved quality of the eBook reading experience. This is evidence of a dynamic, competitive market. These inconvenient facts are ignored in the Complaint. Instead, the Government focuses on increased prices for a handful of titles. The Complaint does not allege that all eBook prices, or even most eBook prices, increased after Apple entered the market.
FORTUNE editor Philip Elmer-Dewitt says he hasn't "had so much fun reading legal documents since the Watergate trials" and suggests that the government "may regret trying to make its e-book antitrust suit stick to Apple."
Last month, NYU law professor Richard Epstein also declared that the Department of Justice's antitrust suit against Apple and publishers over e-Book pricing is a mistake.
Read More [PDF]