The iPhone 5 Outscores the Galaxy S III [Benchmarks]

Show Article
Comments (91)
Linn - September 24, 2012 at 11:51pm
who care what's inside. People care how it works. So far iPhones are known for its fluidly.
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Awayze - September 23, 2012 at 3:29pm
WOW, a dual core vs a quad core. Either way this just shows the Galaxy S3 SUCKS BALLS!
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Meric - September 18, 2012 at 4:30pm
Error, the Galaxy S3 is higher with jelly bean
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Android PinchedLoaf - September 18, 2012 at 1:43pm
Well, we have a device not made of Samsung ass-cheese plastic, that runs "nearly" as fast as a device with twice the cores and ram (but doesn't need to because it doesn't get as bogged down as the sgs in the first place). Once Samsung copies it you might get a better UX, but until then enjoy your parents basement and action figures! Heck, they're made from the same crap (plastic).
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Dan - September 18, 2012 at 4:49am
Yeah, OK
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Noybus - September 17, 2012 at 9:24pm
comparing apples with bananas??? why don't you try galaxy note 2 with its quad processor?
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Sharbeen - September 17, 2012 at 6:00pm
Well I dont think comparing benchmark makes a point here. Both require a different set of power. iOS is designed such a way to consume the specified requirements whereas. No one is going to make apps with compatibility above iPhone 5. iOS way of resource management is different and androids is different. Benchmark comparing to 4S is a valid reason and shows how much more we are going to experience.
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Mr yogi - September 17, 2012 at 5:30pm
Hmm now putting iOS inside the galaxy 3.. That would be perfect. I was once an apple fan boy switching too galaxy. Can't wait!
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Lowan64 - September 17, 2012 at 4:58pm
Well, the tests confirms it: Iphone 5: 1601 and the Galaxy S3: 1744 See for yourself
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Jason Mehrvarz - September 17, 2012 at 10:38pm
This looks "iwashed." The source site at primatelabs gives the nod to SGS3.
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
taran - September 17, 2012 at 3:12pm
Are you guys insane? S3 outscores iPhone 5.
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Mike - September 17, 2012 at 3:16pm
Read the rest of this artilce..... "Update: It appears that since our article there has been a large number of Galaxy S III owners submitting benchmarks to Geekbench. This has increased the average score for the device to 1628 from 1560. A better comparison should be available this weekend after release of iPhone 5 results in average benchmark results for the new device."
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
gringo - September 17, 2012 at 3:41pm
Then iClarified should get rid of this post till next week. As it stands, Galaxy S III is outscoring iPhone 5 and not the other way around.
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Taran - September 17, 2012 at 5:15pm
To be honest Android users dont use Geekbench coz who would pay for a paid benchmarking app when there are 100s of free better benchmarking app in Store. My Galaxy Note I does 1345 on average, now thats so close to iPhone 5 that came 1 year later. Benchmarks are useless.
Reply · Like · Mark as Spam
Add Comment
Follow iClarified
Google Debuts a New Logo [Video]
Google has debuted a new logo that's been upd... At Bat App Gets Expanded Rosters, Ford Sync 3.0 Support, Enhanced Notifications
The At Bat app for iOS has been updat...
Apple to Build 'Next Generation' Retail Store in Memphis Area
Apple is planning to update its Germantown st...
Bing Search App Gets Updated With 'Bing Interests'
The Bing Search app for iPhone has been updat...
Apple Pay Transaction Limit Increased to £30 in the U.K.
The transaction limit for contactless payment...