TIME Magazine Names iPhone 5 as Gadget of the Year

TIME Magazine Names iPhone 5 as Gadget of the Year

Posted by · 14651 views · Translate
TIME Magazine has named the iPhone 5 as the gadget of the year.

Apple may be responsible for more than its share of the tech industry’s great leaps forward, but it’s at least as good at fussing over the tiny little details other companies ignore. The iPhone 5, which starts at $199 with a two-year contract, is one of the most artfully polished gadgets anyone’s ever built, with a taller screen than previous iPhones built into a thinner, lighter case. The camera, with a particularly well-done panorama mode, is another highlight. There are lots of nifty smartphones out there, including the iPhone’s impressive archrival, Samsung’s Galaxy S III. But when it comes to melding hardware, software and services so tightly that the seams fade away, Apple still has no peer.

The Top 10 Gadgets:
● iPhone 5
● Nintendo Wii U
● Sony Cyber-shot RX100
● Raspberry Pi Model B
● Lytro
● Apple 15” MacBook Pro with Retina Display
● Microsoft Surface with Windows RT
● Samsung Galaxy Note II
● Nest
● Simple.TV

Hit the link below for the full 'Top 10 Everything of 2012' list.

Read More

TIME Magazine Names iPhone 5 as Gadget of the Year
Fuckoran jhon - December 13, 2012 at 1:47pm
Apple must have paid hell lot of money.
yoyouyou - December 13, 2012 at 12:54am
“You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.” who cares. you guys get crazy over nothing. Both companies not paying you guys to go at it. make no sense on arguing who is better. they are not going to give you a reward for your comments and praises so please stfu.
Lol - December 12, 2012 at 12:31pm
Really? I wonder how much this cost apple. Maybe the same amount they've been saving with R and D since the launch of the antennagate Iphone 4.
Solid - December 12, 2012 at 8:01am
Tell me they're joking !!
Lol - December 12, 2012 at 3:49am
Really? O wonder how much thos cost Apple. Maybe the same amount they've been saving on R
6 More Comments