During an ongoing federal antitrust case Apple is currently facing, a former iTunes engineer testified that he worked on a project that was “intended to block 100% of non-iTunes clients” and “keep out third-party players” that competed with the iPod.
The plaintiffs subpoenaed Rod Schultz, the former engineer, to show that Apple had worked to block any iTunes or iPod competitors. The plaintiffs argue that Apple's action to hurt competition ultimately raising iPod prices from 2006 to 2009.
Schultz testified in an untucked dress shirt and leather jacket, saying he was an unwilling witness. “I did not want to be talking about” his work on iTunes from 2006-2007, part of which was code-named “Candy,” he said.
Schultz, who left Apple in 2008, reiterated Apple's argument that it released many security improvements to iTunes in an effort to protect the user experience. Apple also claimed that record companies forced it to keep the device secure.
Schultz was the final witness in the case. Judge Rogers plans to send the case to the jury for deliberation sometime next week.
peacefully world for all - December 15, 2014 at 2:16am
Why everyone in here have to be angry with each other?!!! apple and samsung did paid for you?!!!! look like we living in the world full of hate,jealous,..!!! if everything we don't like it,just ignore it..!!! keep your mind is free..!!!! peacefull,enjoy life with your family..!!! use your time more useful than go in here,and fight with the other just about the difference point of view..!!!!!
People come here to vent their frustration. Hopefully they live happier lives "in real life" than they evidence here. This place is a cesspool of hatred and anger. You will find little to no goodwill toward anyone here. If you want kindness and happy people you WILL NEED TO LOOK ELSEWHERE. I wish you luck. I come here for amusement. Happy Hanukkah everyone!!
Blocking non iTunes is normal if you want your things to just work and deals with other issue third party software deal with. It's part of business to protect the solution overall. It's not totally block for there are so many converters in the market to be consider only partly blocked. Not guilty.
Nicely Done! ..Well, it's their ultimate goal to be number #1 and stay there for a while - so it's a necessity, isn't it? Bottom line is "do what you have to do, to kill competition, generate and maximize profit! It's the most significant business rule! ...
NOW, is it justified? ...I'll leave that to all end-users!
What we wonder is that Samsung among others manufacturers key components for Apple, doesn't that make them privy to what Apple is always releasing next and set those manufacturers up to copy it?
Remember back when there was an article of the chips said "Apple switching to tsmc will hurt Samsung"? In general, they can't survive without Apple, while giving them the chips they try to secretly be ahead of them like the watch that was a flop immediately.
There you got the answer. Samsung doesn't copy. Its apple who copy samsung products and components. It's really easy and profitable for Samsung to make components for apple because its something that Samsung already earlier for their own phones and now apple copying and asking Samsung to make it again for their phones. lol
That's what we did to samsung, HTC, Sony and Motorola etc...with the help of our beloved iSheeps. So what is the problem ? We are doing and will be doing.
Thieves. That's how they reached here. Stealing and getting competition out by playing dirty games. Now the truth is out. Truth must be told. Kudos to this gentle man :)