April 16, 2024
Obama: Strong Encryption No Matter What is 'Fetishizing Our Phones'

Obama: Strong Encryption No Matter What is 'Fetishizing Our Phones'

Posted March 12, 2016 at 2:07am by iClarified
President Obama warned tech companies against pushing Congress to make a decision on encryption in an interview with Evan Smith, of the Texas Tribune, at SXSW.

"What will happen is, if everybody goes to their respective corners, and the tech community says ‘either we have strong perfect encryption or else it's Big Brother and an Orwellian world', what you'll find is that after something really bad happens, the politics of this will swing and it will become sloppy and rushed and it will go through Congress in ways that are dangerous and not thought through," the president said.

"My conclusion so far is you cannot take an absolutist view own this," Obama said. "If your argument is strong encryption no matter what, and we can and should in fact create black boxes, that I think does not strike the kind of balance we have lived with for 200, 300 years. And it's fetishizing our phones above every other value. That can't be the right answer. I suspect the answer is going to come down to how do we create a system where the encryption is as strong as possible, the key is as secure as possible, it is accessible by the smallest number of people possible, on a subset of issues we deem is important."


Obama's comments come after an aggressive motion by government prosecutors seeking to compel Apple to build a backdoor into the iPhone used by a San Bernardino shooter.

Apple responded to the motion saying, "it seems like disagreeing with the Department of Justice means you must be evil and anti-American".

[via Verge]


Obama: Strong Encryption No Matter What is 'Fetishizing Our Phones'



Add Comment
Would you like to be notified when someone replies or adds a new comment?
Yes (All Threads)
Yes (This Thread Only)
No
iClarified Icon
Notifications
Would you like to be notified when we post a new Apple news article or tutorial?
Yes
No
Comments (21)
You must login or register to add a comment...
angel_92701
angel_92701 - March 19, 2016 at 6:14pm
i'll say ,if FBI wants a back door. and apple build it. and law enforcement with or without a warrant. Just need probable cause. to access you device. apple can also include on the program to let you know, when FBI or other Gov agency is tapping on your device. and they have to probe that they have a court order to access your device, no just using the program at their will.
angel_92701
angel_92701 - March 19, 2016 at 6:12pm
i'll say ,if FBI wants a back door. and apple build it. and law enforcement with or without a warrant. Just need probable cause. to access you device. apple can also include on the program to let you. when FBI or other Gov agency is tapping on your device. and they have to probe that they have a court order to access your device, no just using the program at their will.
Great
Great - March 14, 2016 at 11:13am
Ok, why can't Apple install a "finger print" for the FBI on all future iPhones? I mean, the iPhone can store many fingerprints right? Just store one that is solely kept at the FBI. And then, the FBI themselves use some other multi-encryption tech to keep that 1 fingerprint secure so no one person has access to it. Maybe in such a way that a number of people or groups need to provide consensus before that 1 fingerprint can be unlocked to be used to, in turn, unlock the target iPhone.
vwarkar
vwarkar - March 14, 2016 at 12:57am
This issue raises unique concerns....for example, If you believe a neighbour has bombs hidden inside his garage, wouldnt you get the police to break open the door? What if the door was unbreakable and you ask the door making company to provide a method to break open this door and they refuse on the basis of privacy for other who use similar doors and the company says that we cannot provide a mechansim to open this ONE door without compromising the integrity of all the doors we ever sold or will sell? What Obama seems to suggest is that this should be thoroughly throught through Because the implications could be bad.....from what I read, he is saying that as few people as possible should have access to be able to open any encryption...dont we do this already with the military?
JoshvanHulst
JoshvanHulst - March 13, 2016 at 11:44pm
Only problem with that is that even if they are outside the USA, government agencies will compel them to comply with U.S. laws, just like France is going to do against Apple.
justabrake
justabrake - March 12, 2016 at 7:08pm
Your smartphone is like a diary you just don't want other people to read it
Captain Japan
Captain Japan - March 14, 2016 at 10:23pm
And a diary can easily be read by law enforcement with or without a warrant. Just need probable cause.
1
Jackson Browne
Jackson Browne - March 12, 2016 at 3:15pm
Nothing is more important than personal privacy. It is the right that needs to be protected above ALL others.
1
Yea
Yea - March 12, 2016 at 7:26pm
Even above retaining info on terrorist activities? Really? What if i arrest a terrorist and he/she has an iPhone. So i have to respect the terrorists privacy? C'mon boo. No
JoshvanHulst
JoshvanHulst - March 13, 2016 at 11:37pm
Couldn't have said it any better!!
Great
Great - March 12, 2016 at 1:21pm
Look guys, he's just saying that if we take the absolute view either way, then when something terrible happens on that side, then the views of the people will swing the other way really fast. It will benefit no one except our enemies. USA was built on the principal of 'having your cake, and eating it too'. Watch that episode of SouthPark. There's truth in there. We need to find a solution where we can break in when needed for the baddies, but also keep everyone else's privacy as well. All this whilst preventing other countries from breaking in. That's how we can have it all.
curtixman
curtixman - March 12, 2016 at 5:51pm
Wrong!
JoshvanHulst
JoshvanHulst - March 13, 2016 at 11:41pm
You have no sense of what privacy means! It means "I have the Right to keep my secrets safe"
Kenny
Kenny - March 12, 2016 at 4:35am
Someone hack his families phones and let's see how fast he "swings" the other way
justabrake
justabrake - March 12, 2016 at 4:29am
The only way I would want my phone broken into is if I was in a coma and nobody knew who I was or I woke up from a coma and needed to remember things I've forgotten ! If I'm dead leave my phone alone The government has no right to my information dead or alive !
itasara
itasara - March 13, 2016 at 5:29am
That is a really good reason for someone to get into your phone. When we couldn't find my son I panicked because I couldn't reach him. He left his phone in his house and disappeared. Because I own the phone I was able to get some of his emails via the provider, but I had no way to get into his phone. It may have helped but at least I had some clues. I can't think of anything on my phone that would help if the government happened to get into it. Some of my apps are already secured thru the company I got them from. What could possibly be on one's phone that would incriminate you as long as you are not a terrorist or enemy of the USA? I don't believe that hacking into ONE phone will hurt the person who is already dead and who was a criminal. I'm sure that Apple could keep the key secret or just to make everyone happy could do an upgrade to everyone's phone so that password encription could be changed.
1
curtixman
curtixman - March 12, 2016 at 2:14am
All that statement makes clear is how little he understands.
Butterspider
Butterspider - March 12, 2016 at 3:19am
Very well said Tim
Nitro Junkie
Nitro Junkie - March 12, 2016 at 5:54am
Exactly. The way I look at it and someone should explain it him. Think of all the security he has everywhere he goes. 24/7. How about once in awhile just leave the backdoor open in the White House, and send the secret service on a break. How would he like it if that happened. If he wouldn't like that happening why should we give up our security in any facet of our lives.
heiry ape
heiry ape - March 12, 2016 at 9:02am
Trump is all for forcing Apple to engineer a backdoor, so he's not interested in preserving your privacy either.
 Jamie
Jamie - March 12, 2016 at 2:13am
First time I have ever heard Obama sound like a lawyer. Of course, that simply means that I have no idea what he said; typical lawyerly gibberish.
Recent. Read the latest Apple News.
RECENT
Tutorials. Help is here.
TUTORIALS
Where to Download macOS Monterey
Where to Download macOS Ventura
AppleTV Firmware Download Locations
Where To Download iPad Firmware Files From
Where To Download iPhone Firmware Files From
Deals. Save on Apple devices and accessories.
DEALS