Samsung Unveils 2560x1600 10.1-inch Display Paving Way for Retina Display iPad

Show Article

Comments (19)

Daniel - May 14, 2011 at 8:00am

I think Apple will have to give up the 10-hours battery life for this....

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

Travis - May 13, 2011 at 6:32pm

This is a PenTile display. PenTiles displays look like ass. They use simulated pixels. This screen is an ugly lie.

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

Trollin - May 13, 2011 at 11:11am

Jizz in my pants

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

fds - May 13, 2011 at 11:08am

it achieves 298.8 PPI, and NOT 300. sqrt(2560^2+1600^2)/10.1

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

David - May 13, 2011 at 10:04am

The aspect ratio of this display is obviously wrong for an iPad. On top of that, though, Apple has also been preferring IPS displays for iPhone and iPad for the superior viewing angle and a 3-subpixel structure for better rendering of smaller text. However, I\'m sure cranking up the manufacturing for this display will also lower costs for other high-res displays.

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

kerin - May 13, 2011 at 5:22pm

i\'m quite sure that the extreme increase in pixel density would compensate for a less-ideal subpixel layout anyway.

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

kamatis - May 13, 2011 at 4:37am

i don\'t think Samsung will just start supplying Apple with these amazingly sharp displays after being being sued by Apple. Samsung will probably just keep these high resolution displays to its own line of tablets, rather than supplying the competition.

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

Jay - May 13, 2011 at 7:59pm

Maybe or Maybe not. It\'s all about the stock market.........

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

donny - May 13, 2011 at 3:29am

what an amazing display it will be! iPad will be an amazing tablet machine.

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

Noman - May 13, 2011 at 3:25am

BullShit - powersaving my ass.. if you know how computers work it will need a lot more prosessingpower (=power) to spin double the amount of pixels on screen. Meaning shorter batterylife and slower responce times... maybe the difference on normal usage makes not such a big difference but imagine running e.g. fps-game on that resolution - needs bloody external display adapter to run it smoothly :D Anyway im sure they will figure it out - maybe just multiple prosessors and space techology - Radioactive battery....

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

Digihead - May 13, 2011 at 3:39am

How many display technologies you invented? Close to zero, right?! So shut the fuck up!

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

JK - May 13, 2011 at 5:48am

Hahahahhahha, LMAO

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

Clueless - May 13, 2011 at 9:16am

That guy is completly CLUELESS, yes it uses more PROCESSING POWER, but CPU AND GPUS ARE WAY MORE EFFICIENT THAN BEFORE, AND IF YOU KNOW ABOUT MOORES LAWS, IN ABOUT A 1 YEAR , SUPPLYING TWO TIMES THE PIXEL WILL NEED LESS POWER, SINCE THE POWER GROW EXPONENTIOLLY MEANWHILE THE POWER CONSUMPTION STAYS THE SAME. What a noob

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

kerin - May 13, 2011 at 5:26pm

...moore\'s law? you mean the moore\'s law that has been progressively less applicable since the late 90s? cool story bro.

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

Noman - May 14, 2011 at 12:51pm

Yeah stupid wannabees... read the comment properly. The difference is not perhaps that crucial when wanking yourself off using 2D apps but the difference in performance requirements when talking about 3D-games is massive when jumping to double amount of pixels. Its pretty straightforward for noobs too that there will be some compromises to be done...

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

NeHoMaR - May 13, 2011 at 3:19am

Very cool Samsung, now tell me how I install Apple App Store apps in your device, and you will win! >:D

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

Jay - May 13, 2011 at 7:55pm

LMAO

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

JK - May 13, 2011 at 3:03am

iPad with current display is killer, and iPad with this display will be killing machine, hope to see it on ipad 3.

Reply · Like · Mark as Spam

1 2 Next >>