Judge Forces Apple to Post Notice Acknowledging That Samsung Didn't Copy iPad

Posted July 18, 2012 at 4:31pm by iClarified | Please help us and submit a translation by clicking here | 6525 views

A U.K. judge is reportedly forcing Apple to post a notice online and in the newspaper acknowledging that Samsung did not copy the iPad, according to Bloomberg.

BusinessInsider reports on the story that came across the Bloomberg terminal.

A judge has ordered Apple to post a notice on its website and in British newspapers highlighting a recent ruling that Samsung didn't copy the iPad. Apple must leave that notice up on its website for the next six months. Ouch!

Apple lost a case against Samsung in Britain earlier this month, as the judge ruled that Samsung's Galaxy Tab tablets weren't cool enough to be confused with the iPad.

We'll update this article as more details are revealed.

Bloomberg Update:
The notice should outline the July 9 London court decision that Samsung's Galaxy tablets don't infringe Apple's registered designs, Judge Colin Birss said. It should be posted on Apple's U.K. website for six months and published in several newspapers and magazines to correct the damaging impression the South Korea-based company was copying Apple's product, Birss said.

The order means Apple will have to publish "an advertisement" for Samsung, and is prejudicial to the company, Richard Hacon, a lawyer representing Cupertino, California-based Apple, told the court. "No company likes to refer to a rival on its website."

Read More

Add Comment
Russell - July 20, 2012 at 12:16am
When apple finally releases a TV, I can't wait for ALL TV manufacturers to sue apple for copying their design elements. PAYBACK TIME!
Nogoodnick - July 18, 2012 at 8:01pm
I can see the notice now, "We've been forced to acknowledge that a Judge doesn't think Samsung copied our designs because they 'aren't cool enough', in tiny tiny print at the bottom of the page..
JoeThePlumber - July 18, 2012 at 6:54pm
Judge cant force shit. Apple would sooner stop selling their products to Brits than post something gay and false like that on their site.
Awayze - July 18, 2012 at 6:18pm
Let's compare Samsucks tablet released before the iPad. Oh wait, all Samsuck do is copy Apple. Samsuck products are cheap shite. They're cheap for a reason and suckers buy them.
Russell - July 20, 2012 at 12:12am
The price difference of a 16gb ipad and a 32gb ipad is $100. Now who is the real sucker?
Me - July 18, 2012 at 6:07pm
Fuck that judge!!
6 More Comments
Follow iClarified
Speed Test: iPhone 6 vs. HTC One M9 Plus vs. Galaxy S6 [Video]
A video comparing the speed of the Apple iPho...
The iPhone, If Apple Released It in 1986 [Images]
Check out these images that show what the iPh...
Apple Campus 2 Begins Rising via Interlocking Concrete Slabs [Video]
Check out this latest aerial video that shows...
Flexbits Teases Fantastical 2 Calendar App for Apple Watch
Flexbits has posted a teaser page for its upc...
Mysterious Apple Vans Gathering Data for Maps, Images for 3D Street View Feature?