
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Against Google for Bypassing Safari Privacy Settings
Posted October 11, 2013 at 5:06am by
Shalom Levytam
A federal judge in Delaware has dismissed a class-action lawsuit brought against Google for bypassing Safari privacy settings, reports the WSJ.
U.S. District Judge Sue Robinson wrote that the companies had circumvented the browsers’ settings, allowing users’ personal information to be sold to ad companies. But the judge said that the plaintiffs couldn’t show that they suffered because the companies collected and sold their information.
Back in 2012, the FTC investigated claims that Google circumvented Safari's ad-block settings in order to store cookies and deliver targeted ads to users. The company agreed to pay a $22.5 million fine to settle the case but denied it did anything improper.
"Google did not intercept contents as provided for by the Wiretap Act," Robinson wrote. "While URLs may provide a description of the contents of a document, e.g., www.helpfordrunks.com, a URL is a location identifier and does not 'concern the substance, purport, or meaning' of an electronic communication."
Robinson also found that the plaintiffs failed to "demonstrate that Google intercepted any 'contents or meaning'" under California's Invasion of Privacy Act or identify "any impairment of the performance or functioning of their computers."
Read More
U.S. District Judge Sue Robinson wrote that the companies had circumvented the browsers’ settings, allowing users’ personal information to be sold to ad companies. But the judge said that the plaintiffs couldn’t show that they suffered because the companies collected and sold their information.
Back in 2012, the FTC investigated claims that Google circumvented Safari's ad-block settings in order to store cookies and deliver targeted ads to users. The company agreed to pay a $22.5 million fine to settle the case but denied it did anything improper.
"Google did not intercept contents as provided for by the Wiretap Act," Robinson wrote. "While URLs may provide a description of the contents of a document, e.g., www.helpfordrunks.com, a URL is a location identifier and does not 'concern the substance, purport, or meaning' of an electronic communication."
Robinson also found that the plaintiffs failed to "demonstrate that Google intercepted any 'contents or meaning'" under California's Invasion of Privacy Act or identify "any impairment of the performance or functioning of their computers."
Read More
![iPhone 18 Pro Sales Rise 12% in China as Apple Leads Weekly Smartphone Market [Report] iPhone 18 Pro Sales Rise 12% in China as Apple Leads Weekly Smartphone Market [Report]](/images/news/102522/102522/102522-160.jpg)
![Apple TV Shares Trailer for 'Awkwafina: The Unlikely Cook' [Video] Apple TV Shares Trailer for 'Awkwafina: The Unlikely Cook' [Video]](/images/news/102513/102513/102513-160.jpg)





![How To Find Your iPhone IMEI Number [Video] How To Find Your iPhone IMEI Number [Video]](/images/tutorials/83557/83557/83557-160.jpg)



![16-Inch M5 Max MacBook Pro Drops $900 to New Low of $3,499 [Deal] 16-Inch M5 Max MacBook Pro Drops $900 to New Low of $3,499 [Deal]](/images/news/102438/102438/102438-160.jpg)
![Magic Keyboard for iPad Air Drops to $200 on Amazon [Deal] Magic Keyboard for iPad Air Drops to $200 on Amazon [Deal]](/images/news/102402/102402/102402-160.jpg)
![13-Inch M5 MacBook Air With 1TB Drops to $1,449 on Amazon [Deal] 13-Inch M5 MacBook Air With 1TB Drops to $1,449 on Amazon [Deal]](/images/news/102345/102345/102345-160.jpg)
