
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Against Google for Bypassing Safari Privacy Settings
Posted October 11, 2013 at 5:06am by
Shalom Levytam
A federal judge in Delaware has dismissed a class-action lawsuit brought against Google for bypassing Safari privacy settings, reports the WSJ.
U.S. District Judge Sue Robinson wrote that the companies had circumvented the browsers’ settings, allowing users’ personal information to be sold to ad companies. But the judge said that the plaintiffs couldn’t show that they suffered because the companies collected and sold their information.
Back in 2012, the FTC investigated claims that Google circumvented Safari's ad-block settings in order to store cookies and deliver targeted ads to users. The company agreed to pay a $22.5 million fine to settle the case but denied it did anything improper.
"Google did not intercept contents as provided for by the Wiretap Act," Robinson wrote. "While URLs may provide a description of the contents of a document, e.g., www.helpfordrunks.com, a URL is a location identifier and does not 'concern the substance, purport, or meaning' of an electronic communication."
Robinson also found that the plaintiffs failed to "demonstrate that Google intercepted any 'contents or meaning'" under California's Invasion of Privacy Act or identify "any impairment of the performance or functioning of their computers."
Read More
U.S. District Judge Sue Robinson wrote that the companies had circumvented the browsers’ settings, allowing users’ personal information to be sold to ad companies. But the judge said that the plaintiffs couldn’t show that they suffered because the companies collected and sold their information.
Back in 2012, the FTC investigated claims that Google circumvented Safari's ad-block settings in order to store cookies and deliver targeted ads to users. The company agreed to pay a $22.5 million fine to settle the case but denied it did anything improper.
"Google did not intercept contents as provided for by the Wiretap Act," Robinson wrote. "While URLs may provide a description of the contents of a document, e.g., www.helpfordrunks.com, a URL is a location identifier and does not 'concern the substance, purport, or meaning' of an electronic communication."
Robinson also found that the plaintiffs failed to "demonstrate that Google intercepted any 'contents or meaning'" under California's Invasion of Privacy Act or identify "any impairment of the performance or functioning of their computers."
Read More

![Apple Prepares Major 2026 Hardware Push With iPhone 17e, New iPads, and M5 Macs [Gurman] Apple Prepares Major 2026 Hardware Push With iPhone 17e, New iPads, and M5 Macs [Gurman]](/images/news/99870/99870/99870-160.jpg)
![Apple Testing Variable Aperture and Large-Aperture Telephoto Cameras for iPhone 18 Pro [Rumor] Apple Testing Variable Aperture and Large-Aperture Telephoto Cameras for iPhone 18 Pro [Rumor]](/images/news/99869/99869/99869-160.jpg)

![Apple Preparing to Allow Third-Party AI Voice Apps in CarPlay [Report] Apple Preparing to Allow Third-Party AI Voice Apps in CarPlay [Report]](/images/news/99865/99865/99865-160.jpg)





![Original AirTag Drops to All-Time Low Price of $17 [Deal] Original AirTag Drops to All-Time Low Price of $17 [Deal]](/images/news/99856/99856/99856-160.jpg)
![iPad Air (M3) Drops to Lowest Price of the Year at $489.99 [Deal] iPad Air (M3) Drops to Lowest Price of the Year at $489.99 [Deal]](/images/news/99843/99843/99843-160.jpg)
![Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 Drop to $199.95 [Deal] Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 Drop to $199.95 [Deal]](/images/news/99815/99815/99815-160.jpg)
![Apple Watch Series 11 Drops Back to All-Time Low of $299 [Deal] Apple Watch Series 11 Drops Back to All-Time Low of $299 [Deal]](/images/news/99283/99283/99283-160.jpg)
![Apple AirPods 4 With Active Noise Cancellation Drop to $119 [Deal] Apple AirPods 4 With Active Noise Cancellation Drop to $119 [Deal]](/images/news/99794/99794/99794-160.jpg)