Judge Paul S. Grewal reviewed boxes of Samsung documents and determined, "having finally crawled out from under the boxes, it appears to the undersigned that if anything was breached, it was this court’s protective order, and that sanctions against Samsung and its attorneys are warranted."
Samsung and its counsel are invited to file a brief by December 2, 2013 to show cause why sanctions should not issue for these violations. Apple and Nokia also may submit a brief by this same date proposing appropriate sanctions. The parties shall address both the legal framework and the evidence relevant to any sanction to be imposed. All briefs may be up to twenty-five pages in length.
Would you like to be notified when someone replies or adds a new comment?
Yes (All Threads)
Yes (This Thread Only)
No
Notifications
Would you like to be notified when we post a new Apple news article or tutorial?
Yes
No
Comments (6)
Comments are closed for this article.
1
rizu - November 10, 2013 at 12:12pm
where are those samsung trolls?
1
Great - November 10, 2013 at 6:40am
Samseng's brief will simply state that they shouldn't be sanctioned because that's the only way they can compete.
1
Nitro Junkie - November 10, 2013 at 6:09am
Where are all the Apple hating Samsung trolls at in the comments. Always quiet when something bad about their beloved Samsung comes up in the news.
1
gamerscul9870 - November 10, 2013 at 1:09pm
They are busy enjoying this moment obviously:3
1
gamerscul9870 - November 10, 2013 at 5:15am
I see why they have nothing better to do than competing by copying!
0
paulMOGG - November 10, 2013 at 4:23am
Samsung needs to be very careful of what they are doing as they are going to end up in serious trouble and their customers will not take them seriously or trust them with their data and info collected from them