April 16, 2024
Apple Says It Ditched the Headphone Jack to Enable Significant Camera, Battery, and Water Resistance Improvements

Apple Says It Ditched the Headphone Jack to Enable Significant Camera, Battery, and Water Resistance Improvements

Posted September 8, 2016 at 1:55am by iClarified
In a BuzzFeed interview following the unveiling of the iPhone 7, Apple executives explain why they ditched the headphone jack.

“The audio connector is more than 100 years old,” said Apple VP Greg Joswiak. “It had its last big innovation about 50 years ago. You know what that was? They made it smaller. It hasn’t been touched since then. It’s a dinosaur. It’s time to move on.”

Dan Riccio, Apple’s senior VP of hardware engineering, said “We’ve got this 50-year-old connector — just a hole filled with air — and it’s just sitting there taking up space, really valuable space. In a world of mobile and cellular connectivity, the one wired vestige out there is this cable hanging from people’s ears to their phones — why?”


“It was holding us back from a number of things we wanted to put into the iPhone,” reveals Riccio. “It was fighting for space with camera technologies and processors and battery life. And frankly, when there’s a better, modern solution available, it’s crazy to keep it around.”

Ricco explains the the driver ledge, a small printed circuit board that drives the display and backlight was typically placed at the top of the device. Unfortunately, the driver ledge interfered with the iPhone 7's larger camera system so Apple wanted to move it lower in both models but there it interfered with the audio jack.

Engineers tried removing the jack and they discovered it was easier to install the new Taptic Engine that is needed for the new touch sensitive home button. Second, they were able to increase the battery's size. The iPhone 7 battery is now 14% bigger and the iPhone 7 Plus battery is now 5% bigger. This gives iPhone 7 users an additional two hours of battery life and iPhone 7 Plus users an additional hour.

Finally, removing the audio jack eliminated a key point of ingress that helped the iPhone meet IP7 water resistance.


Hit the link below for the full report...

Read More


Apple Says It Ditched the Headphone Jack to Enable Significant Camera, Battery, and Water Resistance Improvements
Add Comment
Would you like to be notified when someone replies or adds a new comment?
Yes (All Threads)
Yes (This Thread Only)
No
iClarified Icon
Notifications
Would you like to be notified when we post a new Apple news article or tutorial?
Yes
No
Comments (31)
You must login or register to add a comment...
Kk
Kk - September 8, 2016 at 1:15pm
Audio jack!!!!!!! Come on apple! You are suppose to innovate! Not renovate!
gamerscul9870
gamerscul9870 - September 8, 2016 at 2:23pm
More like you need to be waking up, not assuming without researching and btw the jack hasn't been innovative since the smaller version of it, the 2.5mm jack.
Bay huy
Bay huy - September 8, 2016 at 11:49am
Ok how is speaker water resistant iP67 but headphone jack is not ? Other manufacturers have iP67 headphone jacks!!! But stereo??? Don't you see that the speaker replacing the headphone jack is just 3-4 time smaller than the main speaker!!! So how they will sound equal??? One has large acoustic volume chamber and the other NOT!!! Why the f0ck did you ever put the second one?? To justify the removal of the free analog standard??
gamerscul9870
gamerscul9870 - September 8, 2016 at 12:52pm
It's that the headphone jack has air, the speakers here push the water out like the Apple Watch, plus the 2nd speaker even if it's small is what help amplifies the sound even by its design to deliver sound let alone being 2 of them! The main reason the jack was removed was because 1. It's over 100 years old and we eventually move forward from this, 2. Wireless is becoming more amazing and getting rid of wires. 3. It takes up space of something better to go there.
Great!
Great! - September 8, 2016 at 12:55pm
Other makers' waterproofness aren't as good as they claim.
Bay Huy
Bay Huy - September 8, 2016 at 11:18pm
Why don't apple do it SURROUND SOUND system by main speaker+new 4time smaller speaker + the LCD earpiece speaker :)
Chip
Chip - September 8, 2016 at 9:53am
Apple is right on this one let's try something new however people please do remember this is not a recording studio we are talking about here this is our mobile phones as much as I do know wireless ( I should never say never or would never beat) wires headphones I do think this is a big step forward into making wireless just as good as wired and of this is possible and do believe that Apple made the right choice this time. They will never make a decision if they didn't perfect the technology in which they are giving us. I will trust apple airpods to deliver better quality over those $300 beats crap any day.
A non e moose
A non e moose - September 8, 2016 at 6:17am
Obviously Apple fanatics don't understand the difference between water-proof and water-resistant.
clown
clown - September 8, 2016 at 5:58am
Although they included adapter. Which is good thing. Hopefully the audio is not degraded much more.
A non e moose
A non e moose - September 8, 2016 at 6:19am
HTC back in 2008 came out without audiojack and instead used adapters in the charging port, just like the lightning adapter here. Unfortunately, it was widely criticized as the biggest flaw.
Chip
Chip - September 8, 2016 at 9:59am
Not much folks had HTC like today's iPhone add there aware many wiresless headphones available. Stop comparing what didn't work back then with today. Times have changed many times over since then.
A non e moose
A non e moose - September 8, 2016 at 3:33pm
People losing small adapters don't change with time
clown
clown - September 8, 2016 at 5:52am
Cars are 100 years old, so do we stop using the technology they use. Or do we abandon the technology that a many of iphone users use to plug them into vehicles.
trolls
trolls - September 8, 2016 at 5:57am
Do you still drive 100 years old car?
Bay huy
Bay huy - September 8, 2016 at 2:10am
Hmm wheel is soo old let's replace it with something much more expensive!!! Tha only we can license as lightning chip. And iP67 when the iWatch is 50 meter submersible??? May be next years we may do the iphone 50meters or at least iP68 when we are out of innovations :)
gamerscul9870
gamerscul9870 - September 8, 2016 at 2:18am
Really? The phone that costs the same like 6s include lightning headphones so what you mean that's more expensive??? Besides, it's a long shot before they're out of ideas.
1
Mastah
Mastah - September 8, 2016 at 2:50am
Go buy GoPro if you want to jump into sea and take photo
1
Chris
Chris - September 8, 2016 at 3:03am
The wheel used to be made of wood. Now it's metal and rubber.
Abdullah Butt
Abdullah Butt - September 8, 2016 at 8:53am
Well .... how do I charge & listen to lightening handsfree? Let me guess ..... I should also buy a wireless charging device or spend another $159 to buy a bluetooth wireless Apple handsfree!!!
Chip
Chip - September 8, 2016 at 9:57am
In case people didn't know the originals some watch is water proof to 30meters and the airpods only work with ios10
Bay Huy
Bay Huy - September 8, 2016 at 11:43am
:) then why apple said on the presentation that the original Apple Watch is Splash proof :)
zetaprime
zetaprime - September 8, 2016 at 2:00am
Less holes obviously helps with waterproofing.
gamerscul9870
gamerscul9870 - September 8, 2016 at 2:01am
No wonder most phones attempted to claim they were waterproof, but weren't.
08ada9b
08ada9b - September 8, 2016 at 2:05am
Lol ever heard of galaxy s7 series and note 7. They have open headphone jacks and are MORE waterproof than the new iPhone lol!!
A non e moose
A non e moose - September 8, 2016 at 2:08am
Don't think they ever claimed water proof. They just said water-resistant, just like what they integrated with the new iPhone 7. It's just that other phone makers were able to provide water-resistant phones with the audio-jack.
zetaprime
zetaprime - September 8, 2016 at 2:32am
Maybe but common sense says less openings is better.
Chip
Chip - September 8, 2016 at 10:01am
Your name some says it all about your comment.
Name
Name - September 8, 2016 at 1:37pm
Lots of angry children here lol. Why even argue about water resistance etc Apple need to innovate and they aren't enough. Each year it's evolutionary. Nothing more
A non e moose
A non e moose - September 8, 2016 at 1:56pm
Lol. Some of the old iPhones also suffered some exploding battery packs. You don't see those articles because Apple paid those news media outlets and customers to keep hush.
Zanka
Zanka - September 9, 2016 at 5:09am
You got a source on that? Or are we just here to litter the comment section with Apple hatred like a child?
gamerscul9870
gamerscul9870 - September 10, 2016 at 12:09am
@A non e moose Or you are wrong/ not many people experienced exploding iPhone which there are some articles about that since the 5 (I think that's around the time) Apple would have to try that hard to hush people about it, but that would be defending themeselves which never happened.
Recent. Read the latest Apple News.
RECENT
Tutorials. Help is here.
TUTORIALS
Where to Download macOS Monterey
Where to Download macOS Ventura
AppleTV Firmware Download Locations
Where To Download iPad Firmware Files From
Where To Download iPhone Firmware Files From
Deals. Save on Apple devices and accessories.
DEALS