A class action lawsuit against Apple claims the company deceived users into paying $1 more for HD Version of the film even though their device did not support the format.
In his complaint in San Francisco, plaintiff Scott J Weiselberg claims Apple's default download offering is the more expensive HD option, confusing customers into purchasing the more expensive content even though their older iPhones and iPods did not support the format. Weiselberg Claims he rented the movie "Big Daddy" for $4.99 in June 2010 and was not aware that the SD version was available for $3.99.
Eventually Apple added a notice to the download process to indicate that people with older devices could not play HD content, however the company had already collected millions of dollars in profits.
Apple failed to disclose to consumers they were paying a premium for HD downloads that would not be supported by the SD mobile Apple device, and that the consumers would actually be viewing SD content that was downloaded at the time of the rental.
The plaintiff believes these practices violate California's Unfair Competition Law and seeks restitution, disgorgement, an injunction and damages for unjust enrichment.
Apple news, rumors, tutorials, price drop alerts, in your inbox every evening, free.
Unsubscribe at any time.
Success!
You have been subscribed.
Add Comment
Would you like to be notified when someone replies or adds a new comment?
Yes (All Threads)
Yes (This Thread Only)
No
Notifications
Would you like to be notified when we post a new Apple news article or tutorial?
Yes
No
Comments (12)
Comments are closed for this article.
0
gamerscul9870 - July 9, 2013 at 11:55am
sueing people=b.s.
0
jim oron - July 9, 2013 at 4:24am
no you cannot choose same happens on black apple tvs, on 1st apple tv you could choose sd vs. hd but you cannot choose on newer. Cupertino is also jacking up prices of movies and tv shows. I am not into watching hollywood clowns but deception and price fixing is obvious here for non fanboys. And all prices are always same with Amazon and others
0
Neal - July 9, 2013 at 3:37am
One can buy something on there iPhone and watch it on there MacBook by redownloading it again during the rental time.
0
Neal - July 9, 2013 at 8:18am
companies now have to make every single thing idiot proof or else they will get sued for not making things clear enough for them. and who really downloads a movie on there iphone? takes like 1-2 hours even on wifi. (depending on movie size)
0
chet - July 9, 2013 at 1:26pm
And their you go!
0
AppleGuy299 - July 9, 2013 at 2:41am
That's stupid, the person chose what they wanted!
0
m_thoroughbred - July 9, 2013 at 2:27am
If the person tried to download an HD movie on older devices using iTunes on that iDevice you were only able to download the SD version. If the user downloaded the movie on their computer first and then transferred it to the iDevice then shame on them. But I think that when you downloaded a movie straight to the iDevice that wasn't retina you were only able to download the SD version.
0
Whatever - July 8, 2013 at 8:58pm
Somebody give this guy a dollar so we can all move on.
0
Mike - July 8, 2013 at 10:53pm
Lmaoooo seriously... I know times are tough but doesnt it cost more to get a lawyer than go to work and make a dollar in an hour?
0
Kokkocrispified - July 8, 2013 at 8:42pm
Ill sue Walmart for selling me a blu ray when I only have std dvd player. How dare they! Get my Lawyer on the phone ASAP!!
0
Za - July 8, 2013 at 8:34pm
They're lawyers involved. That's the only reason you're hearing about this lawsuit.
0
unlockmyidevice - July 8, 2013 at 8:24pm
Buyer beware.Know what your device is capable of before paying for it.