A U.S Judge says she is concerned by Apple's $450 million settlement in the E-Books price-fixing case.
U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan said she was concerned over provisions in the settlement that could drastically reduce the amount of money paid to consumers. A clause in the agreement requires Apple to pay only $70 million if an appeals court were to reverse her original decision.
Speaking on a teleconference, Cote questioned if that would be fair and what might happen if the appeals court reversed her ruling on a minor issue. She also took issue with the lack of any requirement for Apple to pay interest while the appeals go forward.
"I'm concerned about the terms of the settlement," she said
If Apple loses the appeal it would pay $400 million to consumers and $50 million to the states and plaintiffs' lawyers. If Apple's appeal is successful but the 2nd Circuit returns the case to Cote for further proceedings, Apple would pay just $70 million ($50 million would go to consumers).
If the 2nd Circuit reverses Cote's ruling outright, it would end the case, Apple would pay nothing.
Apple news, rumors, tutorials, price drop alerts, in your inbox every evening, free.
Unsubscribe at any time.
Success!
You have been subscribed.
Add Comment
Would you like to be notified when someone replies or adds a new comment?
Yes (All Threads)
Yes (This Thread Only)
No
Notifications
Would you like to be notified when we post a new Apple news article or tutorial?
Yes
No
Comments (10)
Comments are closed for this article.
0
George - July 28, 2014 at 5:15am
NEWS FLASH!! Apple the richest company in the world got caught red handed in over charging isheeps on ebooks. Knowing that a huge lawsuit will follow decides to settle.
Corporate greed at it best!!! Mindless isheeps will always defend that Apple did no wrong.
0
George - July 28, 2014 at 5:22am
Hi mindless isheep......he he
0
gamerscul9870 - July 28, 2014 at 5:00am
It's me, just about as clueless as the guy claiming greedy bull shit. Don't feel bad for hi, I'm the only pity side I brought upon these poor souls such as Tony, Wow, Apple junk, Apple pie, Apple Kunt, and many others. We all know how we still attempt at being better all we want but it's the fact that sums anything up, for us bad than it seems. ROFL
0
Scrawny Strive - July 28, 2014 at 5:04am
Blah Blah. ra ra waaa waaa waaa.uuuggg hhhuuuu poo poo paa ppaa naaaa boo hoo boo
0
gamerscul9870 - July 28, 2014 at 5:08am
My existance exactly. Hands down.
0
Gruel - July 25, 2014 at 4:16pm
LAWL...I am the best trash talker on iclarufied. LAWL.
Who is next?
0
Wolverinemarky - July 25, 2014 at 11:53am
You all know it was amazon snitching on apple they want the monopoly on books and they couldn't get paid the same way apple was and they got pissed cause apple got a better deal then them
0
prostovanka - July 25, 2014 at 6:13pm
That is just how the corporate world works.
0
Techno - July 25, 2014 at 5:13am
The only real concern by the judge is that she isn't getting the publicity to win against Apple and the damn Lawyer friends of her doesn't get PAID!! The court looses in financial game from the inability to get the giant corporate. The greed is obvious and there always those who loves to profit from those that profit most. Financial law 101
0
Mike Power - July 25, 2014 at 2:29am
Thief Jobs Ghost must be in the court room whispering to the judge's ear, there will be a $40 mil check in the mail, just don't rule against us.