Apple: It Seems Like Disagreeing With the DOJ Means You Must be Evil and Anti-American

Apple: It Seems Like Disagreeing With the DOJ Means You Must be Evil and Anti-American

Posted by · 11244 views · Translate

Apple Lawyer Bruce Sewell has responded to a new motion filed by prosecutors seeking to compel Apple to build a backdoor into the iPhone used by a San Bernardino shooter.

The motion aggressively attacks Apple. "Apple’s rhetoric is not only false, but also corrosive of the very institutions that are best able to safeguard our liberty and our rights."

The language of the brief was so hostile that Apple held a conference call with members of the press to voice its disapproval.

Here's what Sewell had to say...

The tone of the brief reads like an indictment. We’ve all heard director Comey and Attorney General Lynch thank Apple for its consistent help in working with law enforcement. Director Comey’s own statement…that there are no demons here? We certainly wouldn’t conclude it from this brief. In 30 years of practice, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a legal brief that was more intended to smear the other side with false accusations and innuendo, and less intended to focus on the real merits of the case. For the first time ever, we see an allegation that Apple has deliberately made changes to block law enforcement requests for access. This should be deeply offensive to everyone that reads it. An unsupported, unsubstantiated effort to vilify Apple rather than confront the issues in the case.

To do this in a brief before a magistrate judge just shows the desperation that the Department of Justice now feels. We would never respond in kind. But imagine Apple asking a court whether the FBI could be trusted because, there is this real question about whether J. Edgar Hoover ordered the assassination of Kennedy. See as our supporting evidence. We add security features to protect our customers from hackers and criminals. And the FBI should be helping to support us in this because it keeps everyone safe. To suggest otherwise is demeaning. It cheapens the debate and it tries the mask the real and serious issues. I can only conclude that the DoJ is so desperate at this point that it has thrown all decorum to the winds.

Look, we know there are great people in the DoJ and the FBI. We work shoulder to shoulder with them all the time. That’s why this cheap shot brief surprises us so much. We help when we’re asked to. We’re honest about what we can and can’t do. Let’s at least treat one another with respect and get this case before the American people in a responsible way. We are going to court to exercise our legal rights. Everyone should beware, because it seems like disagreeing with the Department of Justice means you must be evil and anti-American. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Please follow iClarified on Twitter, Facebook, Google+, or RSS for further updates.

[via Verge]

Apple: It Seems Like Disagreeing With the DOJ Means You Must be Evil and Anti-American

SayingWhatEveryonesThinking - March 12, 2016 at 3:32am
I hope this article's transcript is filled with typos, because if it's accurate that means Sewell writes horribly, with poor punctuation.
Scott - March 12, 2016 at 1:50am
Evil like Tim Cook going to a secret meeting with other elites so they can come up with a plan to circumvent the will of the American people in a presidential election? That kind of evil?
Timmaay - March 12, 2016 at 7:33pm
Sh'yeah right? Cook should be indicted next to hillary. Or hil-dog shout out to south park lol
Edgar Arias - March 11, 2016 at 4:33pm
Here in Bolivia and in Venezuela, if you do not agree with the government, you are branded evil, country seller, that you are a lackey of the evil USA. I am sorry that in your great country there are people who have the same mentality
Butterspider - March 11, 2016 at 11:57am
I think they expect them to follow the constitution.
7 More Comments