Samsung said it doesn't believe it owes Apple a nickel and that there will be dancing in the streets of Cupertino if the jury awards them even $100 million, during closing arguments in the Apple vs. Samsung trial.
Apple told the jury that anything short of a massive award for damages would validate Samsung's 'illegal strategy' to copy the features of the iPhone, reports the WSJ. Apple is seeking $2.2 billion in damages from Samsung.
“We don’t think we owe Apple a nickel,” said John Quinn, a Samsung lawyer. “They’ll be dancing in the streets of Cupertino if you give them $100 million.”
This is the second Apple vs. Samsung trial. Apple won the first trial and Samsung was ordered to pay them $1 billion in damages. The jury award in that case was adjusted down slightly to $992 million.
Apple is accusing Samsung of infringing on five utility patents that cover narrow software features such as auto-correct, slide to unlock, universal search, and others. Samsung is also counter-suing Apple for two utility patents that cover wireless video transmission and a method for organizing digital photos.
In his closing arguments, Apple lawyer Harold McElhinny said the iPhone was a revolutionary product and it caught the industry off-guard.
“Where was Samsung before the iPhone? You know the answer to that one. They didn’t even have a smartphone,” said McElhinny. He also noted that Samsung was not 'brave enough' to have its executives fly in from South Korea for cross-examination.
McElhinny told jurors that legal action was a last resort because Samsung refused to stop copying the iPhone even after being warned to stop. “Samsung was committed with trying to get away from patent infringement,” he said. “Apple simply can not walk away from its inventions.” McElhinny also told the jury that “We’re counting on you for justice.”
This time around Samsung brought Google into the mix to help its defense. “We’re not pointing the finger at Google,” said Samsung lawyer Bill Price. “We’re saying they independently developed these features, and they don’t infringe.”
Notably, a lawyer for Google testified recently that the company has agreed to take over defense of some of the claims in the case and compensate Samsung should it lose on those claims.
The jury has begun deliberations, you can follow iClarified on Twitter, Facebook, or RSS to find out the verdict.
A new miley cyrus song saying : "we don't think" we won't think and we can't think. so la la de da de, we like to not think, because thinking is bad! All rights reserved to samsung "we don't think" -samsung
Apple - Samsung
Apple made the front faced camera ON THE IPHONE, when the next samsung phone was released, it was on it. Apple bought Siri from a company and put it on the iPhone, when the next samsung phone was released, s voice was on it. Apple put the touch id (fingerprint scanner) on the iPhone, when the next samsung phone was released, it was on it. I don't know if samsung has rights or not to do so, but i know every time they keep copying Apple, and then they release ads mocking Apple, Microsoft and Nokia, saying that samsung has multi-tasking, (handle two apps at one screen) and many other things. It's really annoying considering the fact that Apple doesn't mock them. Apple invents, and samsung copies.
Apple - Samsung
Apple made the front faced camera ON THE IPHONE, when the next samsung phone was released, it was on it. Apple bought Siri from a company and put it on the iPhone, when the next samsung phone was released, s voice was on it. Apple put the touch id (fingerprint scanner) on the iPhone, when the next samsung phone was released, it was on it. I don't know it samsung has rights or not to do so, but i know every time they keep copying Apple, and then they release ads mocking Apple, Microsoft and Nokia, saying that samsung has multi-tasking, (handle two apps at one screen) and many other things. It's really annoying considering the fact that Apple doesn't mock them. Apple invents, and samsung copies.
Why you guys are fighting like this. Do you get anything from Apple or Samsung for fighting ? They are just manufacturers and they do whatever they want to get business. Everybody copies everything. But some in that they leave a mark behind. Apple has not invented touch screen or putting OS on a phone. There are number of companies done that before including microsoft. What apple did was to revolutionize the use of OS on a phone and it can be said, that samsung copied or its a coincidence that they made android phones.
how can they say that? without an iPhone, Samsung galaxy won't be existing today. Geez....Samesoon.
3GS, GalaxyS3
iphone 4S, Galaxy S4
iPhone 5S gets finger print sensor, Galaxy 5S gets finger prints.
what else?
They don't think is their new phrase, what about being innovative? What about all those other times they lost in trial? Now they think they can be defensive? Truth hurts samsheeps.