Scientists have developed a new battery that can be recharged up to 70% in 2 minutes and has a lifespan of over 20 years, reports Science Daily.
The battery was developed by scientists from Nanyang Technological University (NTU Singapore) and is expected to impact many industries, especially electric vehicles which suffer from long recharge times of over 4 hours and limited lifespan.
The battery will let electric vehicles charge 20 times faster than currently possible. Also, the battery can endure more than 10,000 charging cycles. That's 20 times more than the 500 cycles typical of today's batteries.
NTU Singapore's scientists replaced the traditional graphite used for the anode (negative pole) in lithium-ion batteries with a new gel material made from titanium dioxide, an abundant, cheap and safe material found in soil. It is commonly used as a food additive or in sunscreen lotions to absorb harmful ultraviolet rays. Naturally found in a spherical shape, NTU Singapore developed a simple method to turn titanium dioxide particles into tiny nanotubes that are a thousand times thinner than the diameter of a human hair. This nanostructure is what helps to speeds up the chemical reactions taking place in the new battery, allowing for superfast charging.
The battery was invented by Associate Professor Chen Xiaodong from the School of Materials Science and Engineering at NTU Singapore.
NTU professor Rachid Yazami, the co-inventor of the lithium-graphite anode that is used in most lithium-ion batteries today, said Chen's invention is the next big leap in battery technology.
"While the cost of lithium-ion batteries has been significantly reduced and its performance improved since Sony commercialised it in 1991, the market is fast expanding towards new applications in electric mobility and energy storage," said Prof Yazami. "There is still room for improvement and one such key area is the power density -- how much power can be stored in a certain amount of space -- which directly relates to the fast charge ability. Ideally, the charge time for batteries in electric vehicles should be less than 15 minutes, which Prof Chen's nanostructured anode has proven to do."
Apple news, rumors, tutorials, price drop alerts, in your inbox every evening, free.
Unsubscribe at any time.
Success!
You have been subscribed.
Add Comment
Would you like to be notified when someone replies or adds a new comment?
Yes (All Threads)
Yes (This Thread Only)
No
Notifications
Would you like to be notified when we post a new Apple news article or tutorial?
Yes
No
Comments (28)
Comments are closed for this article.
0
justadrianfletcher - October 14, 2014 at 9:23pm
meet the newest billionaires
0
Oliversl - October 14, 2014 at 3:54pm
iPhone 7
0
Mas22 - October 14, 2014 at 6:33am
"Atomic" batteries are smaller, never need recharging and last more than 20 years...
0
marc767 - October 14, 2014 at 4:53am
Now to make it useful, go put it in the Apple watch by January and we have a winner.
1
zetaprime - October 14, 2014 at 4:31am
They love to promise stuff like this and then 10 years later no products ever show up. They should wait until they have something people can go out and buy tomorrow.
0
jos1 - October 14, 2014 at 1:33am
The perfect solution for apple's wallhugging devices
0
gamerscul9870 - October 14, 2014 at 1:53am
Galaxy does the same thing. Sure you can switch batteries but needs to charge while in the phone. Every phone is a wall huger but Genneo can make it charge anywhere just with motion, no solar energy or electricity required.
0
jos1 - October 14, 2014 at 11:01am
Ok this new product and genneo solution for apple devices.
0
BruceG - October 14, 2014 at 12:10am
Apple needs to jump into this for their gadgets!
0
gamerscul9870 - October 14, 2014 at 12:59am
That is if it will work perfect with iPhones and better yet fit in them.
0
City023 - October 14, 2014 at 12:00am
So what's that battery being used on the Rovers by NASA on Mars? It lasts 3 years!!!! These type of batteries are already made, just waiting for the government to release it to the public. Or will that kill Duracell, Energizer and others. Huh?
0
Boyko - October 14, 2014 at 10:58am
The rover does not run on lithium-ion batteries.. it has nuclear generator on board.
0
paulMOGG - October 13, 2014 at 11:58pm
Now we will have no excuse not to produce electric cars! Are you listening all you car manufactures and gas petrol conglomerates and governments! Don't try and stop electric cars happening to protect your private invested interests! Protect the planet from pollution!!???
0
Guest - October 13, 2014 at 11:34pm
Great! Now make them bigger and put them in a vehicle.
0
cciev - October 13, 2014 at 10:11pm
Good Advancement in battery technology. Hope its practical enough and hits production soon.
0
Nuck Chorris - October 13, 2014 at 9:06pm
So now apple buys Singapore and has already filed several patents to protect their IP.
0
iHA69 - October 13, 2014 at 8:55pm
Long battery life and having waterproof technology needs to come asap.
0
gamerscul9870 - October 13, 2014 at 8:56pm
Don't forget sapphire.
0
noone - October 13, 2014 at 8:52pm
why 70%?
0
gamerscul9870 - October 13, 2014 at 8:53pm
Why not?
0
Mr Logical - October 14, 2014 at 10:24am
I assume 70% is approximated from 63%. Which is the charge level gained after 1 time constant of exponential charge. Or maybe it is just random because a nice rounded 2 minute is such a good sounding amount of time.
0
noone - October 14, 2014 at 12:42pm
why not recharge the battery in 3 minutes to fully charged assuming it takes a minute to charge 35%?
0
Monkey - October 13, 2014 at 8:47pm
It's people like him who contribute to solving human crises. Speed up the process Stockholm to give this man the Nobel in physics/chemistry next year.message to Elon Musk: put your $ behind this research. You can then bring electric cars to the mass public for less than $30k. If you don't, Mercedes-Benz will put it in their diesel electric hybrid and your cars will be irrelevant.
0
Fiya_lance - October 13, 2014 at 8:42pm
I wonder how long before it get to smartphones
0
Mike - October 13, 2014 at 8:18pm
So we expect to see that on the next Samsung and then in 5 years for the iPhone, right?
0
gamerscul9870 - October 13, 2014 at 8:44pm
Yawn. Why would it be that long between both companies to make those, besides we'll see who gets it first because when one gets the other immediately takes.