Apple CEO Tim Cook has taken to Twitter to voice his opinion on Indiana's controversial new law.
Governor Mike Pence signed The Religious Freedom Restoration Act into law yesterday which lets individuals or corporations cite religious beliefs as a defense when being sued by a private party.
"Today I signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, because I support the freedom of religion for every Hoosier of every faith," Pence said in a statement Thursday. "The Constitution of the United States and the Indiana Constitution both provide strong recognition of the freedom of religion but today, many people of faith feel their religious liberty is under attack by government action."
"This was a measure that frankly, Indiana should have enacted many years ago," Pence said. "It gives our courts guidance about evaluating government action and puts the highest standard -- it essentially says, if a government is going to compel you to act in a way that violates your religious beliefs, there has to be a compelling state interest."
The law is seen by many as a way for businesses to legally discriminate against the LGBT community; whereas, supporters of the bill see it as protecting them from being forced to act in a way that violates their religious beliefs. It's received harsh criticism from Salesforce, the NCAA, and other organizations.
Apple CEO Tim Cook had this to say:
"Apple is open for everyone. We are deeply disappointed in Indiana's new law and calling on Arkansas Gov. to veto the similar #HB1228."
"Around the world, we strive to treat every customer the same — regardless of where they come from, how they worship or who they love."
Cook announced he was gay late last year and Apple was among 379 companies that filed a friend-of-the-court brief pressing the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn bans on same-sex marriage in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee.
Apple news, rumors, tutorials, price drop alerts, in your inbox every evening, free.
Unsubscribe at any time.
Success!
You have been subscribed.
Add Comment
Would you like to be notified when someone replies or adds a new comment?
Yes (All Threads)
Yes (This Thread Only)
No
Notifications
Would you like to be notified when we post a new Apple news article or tutorial?
Yes
No
Comments (14)
Comments are closed for this article.
0
justabrake - March 29, 2015 at 6:26pm
Good it's about time someone stops shop owners from being sued and put out of business ! First amendment rights !
0
Jean Sandoval - March 29, 2015 at 2:18pm
It's all about mutual respect. Its impossible to have mutual respect if Christians can't express and support their beliefs that come from the bible and same goes to the LGBT community who have the freedom to express themselves. I'm a committed follower of Jesus, and have many friends and people around me who may not be 'Christians' (yes, some are gay and lesbian) BUT there's love and respect for each other. I'm not trying to change them and they are not trying to change me, simply because we must live our lives by our actions- Apple, i love you, BUT just because it may not be according to your beliefs it doesnt mean they're wrong.. And Christians, God IS the judge, not you. As Christians, we must live a life full of love and respect, the same way Jesus did when he was here on earth. Thanx for reading, much love!
0
t11chb - March 28, 2015 at 7:49pm
Religion is under attack by Religion, I have no religion btw, it's what I see around me
1
PaladinLV - March 28, 2015 at 3:39am
Tim,
Lead Apple and continued success but keep your nose out of politics!
0
dk2013 - March 28, 2015 at 11:15am
Politics and human rights are two very different things. This is not about politics, it's about human rights.
0
PaladinLV - March 29, 2015 at 4:23pm
Wrong!
Let's look at another example.
A customer comes in to a bakery and asks the owner for a cake with hateful symbols. If the owner is Jewish, is he required to make it?
How about someone goes into a bakery and asks for a confederate flag cake. The owner is Afro-american. Is he required to make it?
If you answered "yes" to these examples then you are confusing what "human rights" are truly about.
BTW - don't the owners of the establishments have human rights too? What about their rights!
It is not only about one specific group!
0
Jackson Browne - March 28, 2015 at 2:28am
This is a bad law. However, it is a somewhat understandable reaction to some bad judicial decisions which forced some businesses to provide services that they did not wish to provide and that were readily available elsewhere. This law will not have any impact in employment; it does not allow any discrimination in employment.
0
Moofy - March 27, 2015 at 9:57pm
Most haven't even read the law.
It doesn't allow for discrimination.
Let's consider the following....
So if someone walks into a gay owned restaurant establishment wearing a t shirt with nasty gay slurs should the owner have the right not to serve them?
The marketplace will quickly solve these kind of issues. Any business that openly discriminates will face negative attention. Particularly in this internet connected age.
No need for government intervention.
1
Dan - March 27, 2015 at 8:45pm
Indiana law is what we need in every state
0
Mr Logical - March 27, 2015 at 8:41pm
What are the real life implications of this law?
0
Techno - March 27, 2015 at 8:45pm
Judge anyone and any beliefs, of one base on their own religion.
0
Michael_G - March 27, 2015 at 8:47pm
Eric Miller (America Advance) gave these examples of where it would 'help': Christian bakers, florists and photographers should not be punished for refusing to participate in a homosexual marriage, A Christian business should not be punished for refusing to allow a man to use the women’s restroom, A church should not be punished because they refuse to let the church be used for a homosexual wedding
0
dk2013 - March 27, 2015 at 8:54pm
Michael, those are ridiculous examples and have nothing to do with this issue. The issue is simply whether someone can be fired for being gay. Nobody is talking about being allowed into the office with extreme or offensive behavior... other than just being gay. It is a common, and despicable, tactic to try to obfuscate the issue this way. Let's stick to the matter at hand, and judge it on its own merits.
0
Michael_G - March 27, 2015 at 9:05pm
I'm not saying whether I agree or disagree with the law. I'm saying that the argument is that business owners and individuals shouldn't have to participate in events or actions that violate their religious belief. For example, previously a Christian wedding photographer could have been sued for not agreeing to photograph a gay wedding. Do you think they should have a right to refuse the client? Or do you think that they should be legally forced to take on the client?