Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster has lowered his target for Apple from $788 down to $688, reports Business Insider.
Munster believes that Apple's introduction of a low cost iPhone will result in significant cannibalization of its higher priced iPhone sales.
Here's his 'worst case scenario' with a low cost iPhone: ● For every three cheap iPhones sold, Apple sells one less high end phone. He thinks the cheap iPhone sells for $300. ● In calendar year 2014, he sees high end iPhone sales increasing by 6%. He thinks Apple sells 75 million low cost iPhones in 2014, taking 11% of the low end market. ● Margins decline slightly. Munster estimates "gross margin goes to 36.6% in CY14 vs. 38.6% in Dec-12. This assumes a $300 ASP, and a 30% gross margin for the cheaper iPhone vs. $620 ASP and a 55% gross margin for the high end iPhone." ● June guidance will be $34-$36 billion, compared to the street at $39.6 billion. ● The dividend will be increased to $14, up from $10.60. He doesn't expect an increase in buybacks. Debt is an option.
Apple news, rumors, tutorials, price drop alerts, in your inbox every evening, free.
Unsubscribe at any time.
Success!
You have been subscribed.
Add Comment
Would you like to be notified when someone replies or adds a new comment?
Yes (All Threads)
Yes (This Thread Only)
No
Notifications
Would you like to be notified when we post a new Apple news article or tutorial?
Yes
No
Comments (2)
Comments are closed for this article.
0
Anthony - April 16, 2013 at 2:47pm
Lest we forget, #Apple's core customer base are not cheap-skates, with that being said- not to say that low-end iPhone customers are poor or less fortunate. But I think the lesser iPhone can not cannibalize a market that is already at such a high capacity, and expectations are through the roof for innovation and new product design. I don't see an iPhone 5 customer opting for a cheaper iPhone when the next gen phone is released....
0
Andre J - April 16, 2013 at 2:17pm
Lol what is this analyst talking about? Where do you see a low cost iPhone? And how can you base a PT on something that doesn't exist?