Microsoft Kept the Surface Tablet a Secret Using an Underground Bunker
LIKE
TWEET
SHARE
PIN
SHARE
POST
MAIL
MORE
Posted June 22, 2012 at 6:01pm by iClarified
Microsoft reveals some of the steps it took to keep the Surface tablet secret while in development to TechRadar.
The design team initially worked in what Stevie Bathiche, Microsoft's hardware maven, calls an underground bunker with no windows. When the team outgrew that they moved above ground into a larger building; this one did have windows but it also had the kind of security you associate with bank vaults (or Microsoft's cloud data centers for services like Office 365, which have guards with guns and take biometric verification to get into).
Getting into the Surface building means going through airlock-style doors; the outer door has to close before you can get through the second door and go inside, so you know there's no-one sneaking in behind you.
In its report, TechRadar also discusses a few of the secrets that are still being withheld, such as the screen resolution.
Microsoft says the Surface uses a ClearType display which uses the fourth pixel in the RGB pixel group to paint characters more accurately. "The specific pixel geometry rendering and optical bonding create an effect where the eye can't distinguish individual pixels at the right viewing distance".
The site calculates that in order for two Metro-style apps to run side by side the resolution must be at least 1366x768 but full HD needs 1080 lines so they expect ClearType Full HD displays to be at least 1920x1080.
You can find more background information on Microsoft's upcoming tablet at the link below...
It's sad for them to resort to this method , all the while Windows8 shows no superiority to Android or OS X. Surely any design team can come up with neat ideas on how to package all the hardware bits into a neat-looking gadget. Samsung, HTC, or Asus have done all that. The bottom line is whether consumers will embrace it. MS dominated the early desktop OS scene because of their Office suite. In mobile computing, it is not relevant anymore.
Everyone here likes to make fun of M$ but I couldn't imagine a world without M$. M$ brought the PC to just about every home and paved a way for the world in a way that I just don't think Apple would have been able to do, not in the early days. Yea so SJ had a good run this last decade and the products are truly impressive but without the foundation of LINUX and the PC world as a whole I just don't think Apple would be as awesome as you would like to think it would be. I think you all like to forget how we as a computing world got to where we are today. Instead you would just rather put certain people on a pedestal just because they came out with a great design that spawned a nice line of equipment then from that point drink all the Apple kool-aid you can get. If SJ had it his way there would be no open source or competition it would most likely be an "Orwellian" computing world. I just can't forget how long it took Apple to get to where it is today (with the help of M$) and I clearly remember the Apple days before OSX and iOS and the days of the "Sad Mac". Its all about the ROOTS.
I find it incredibly hard to believe that the tablet wasn't just whipped up backstage before the event. Is it really that difficult to rub off the logo from any number of iPad keyboard covers?
I think it was Monkey Boy Ballmer that was kept down in the bunker.