
Aperture Workflow Speed is Almost 3x Faster Than Lightroom
Posted December 2, 2010 at 2:09pm by
Shalom Levytam
Thomas Boyd has done a workflow speed test to compare Apple Aperture and Adobe Lightroom.
Byod imported a whopping 600 RAW Canon images and waited for each image to render before moving to the next.
The rendering performance of Lightroom was dramatically slower than Aperture. Not only was rendering slow, there was a one or two second lag between the time of pushing the right arrow button and the time it took for the next image to appear - unrendered. It was excruciatingly slow. I wasn't prepared for that.
It took Boyd under 8 minutes in Aperture 3 and just under 23 minutes in Lightroom 3 to complete the test.
Take a look at the video below in which the entire procedure is documented.
Byod imported a whopping 600 RAW Canon images and waited for each image to render before moving to the next.
The rendering performance of Lightroom was dramatically slower than Aperture. Not only was rendering slow, there was a one or two second lag between the time of pushing the right arrow button and the time it took for the next image to appear - unrendered. It was excruciatingly slow. I wasn't prepared for that.
It took Boyd under 8 minutes in Aperture 3 and just under 23 minutes in Lightroom 3 to complete the test.
Take a look at the video below in which the entire procedure is documented.

![Apple Releases iOS 26.4.1 and iPadOS 26.4.1 With Bug Fixes [Download] Apple Releases iOS 26.4.1 and iPadOS 26.4.1 With Bug Fixes [Download]](/images/news/100492/100492/100492-160.jpg)

![Apple TV Debuts 'Criminal Record' Season 2 Trailer [Video] Apple TV Debuts 'Criminal Record' Season 2 Trailer [Video]](/images/news/100488/100488/100488-160.jpg)






![13-inch MacBook Air M5 Drops to $949 in New All-Time Low [Deal] 13-inch MacBook Air M5 Drops to $949 in New All-Time Low [Deal]](/images/news/100466/100466/100466-160.jpg)



